Tara Reck, Managing L&I Attorney at Reck Law PLLC - Workers' Compensation Attorneys

Category: Retraining Vocational (Page 4 of 5)

Workers Comp Claim and Return to Work Programs: The Vocational Recovery Project

The  Vocational Recovery Project is an ongoing workers’ compensation initiative by the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I).  According to L&I, the goal of this initiative is to “engage all parties in preventing work disability by improving return-to-work outcomes”.  Personally, I think there are a few problems with the goals of this initiative. For example, one problem is that different parties have very different perspectives. Specifically, what does it mean to improve outcomes? And, what happens when L&I makes vocational decisions under an L&I claim or workers’ compensation claim that are not practical?

 

Return to work after a work injury

L&I started the Vocational Recovery Project several years ago. Unfortunately, since then, I haven’t seen much improvement in setting work injury claimants up for success when returning to work. For me, it seems that L&I and most vocational services companies think that improving outcomes means making more determinations. These determinations dictate that people with work injury are capable of working. In other words, they put the emphasis on making the determination. Yet, they ignore important considerations, such as ensuring that the work injury claimant can succeed in returning to work.

 

If you think about it, when someone determines that a person can work, it doesn’t necessarily equate to improving the outcome for the worker. Practically speaking, to improve the outcome, there must be a plan for success. The plan has to show how and why the worker will successfully fulfill their job duties over time. Realistically, absent such a plan, a work injury claimant cannot return to work in a sustainable way.

 

Every workers’ compensation claim and work injury victim is different

I wrote many articles about vocational services. Some articles talk about vocational retraining, vocational counseling, plan development, ability to work assessment, and other topics. On more than one occasion, I’ve been criticized and called out for what others assume is my “bias”.  Many assume that the only outcome acceptable for my clients is for them to be on pension. In other words, for my clients to be totally disabled and incapable of working. Not only is the assumption incorrect, it is downright insulting.

 

The optimal outcome in each case depends on its specific facts and circumstances. In short, it depends on the person that suffered the work accident, their medical limitations, and other individual-specific factors. Vocational services, especially vocational retraining plans, are often critical to ensuring an optimal outcome for work injury claimants.  Unfortunately, I worry that this aspect of improving return-to-work outcomes isn’t getting attention under the Vocational Recovery Project. Evidently, this is the list of project advisors. Do you see any representation for work injury claimants? There doesn’t appear to be a voice for those who suffer a work injury.

 

Workers comp claims and return to work plans

If you ask me, improving outcomes in a workers’ compensation claim or L&I claim requires more than determinations. It requires empathy and understanding of unique challenges that individuals face after a work injury.  Furthermore, it requires listening, collaborating, and keeping an open mind.

 

If you empower work injury claimants and give them hope, then they will take control over their life. We must be creative when we address and navigate their challenging life circumstances. Why can’t we treat work injury victims as intelligent adults and give them a say in their future? Unfortunately, most workers’ comp claim return-to-work determination outcomes are less than favorable for these individuals.

 

Final notes and thoughts

There seems to be a popular misconception. Contrary to what you might think, most work injury claimants don’t want to be totally disabled. Instead, from my observations, most want a realistic solution for how to lead productive lives after a life-changing work injury or occupational disease. For most, it means giving them the opportunity to make the fullest recovery possible.

 

Clearly, some people will never recover from their work injuries or occupational illness. Ultimately, their goal is to be able to successfully return to a stable and meaningful professional and personal life.  If you want to improve return-to-work outcomes, you must pay closer consideration to the injured worker.

 

L&I Claim Retraining and Vocational Services: The Office Careers Saga Continues

I previously posted about the investigative reporting by Susannah Frame at King 5 regarding the Office Careers retraining program. Yesterday, the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) publicly announced a moratorium on Office Careers retraining plans in L&I claims.

 

L&I retraining services put a hold on Office Careers

L&I published a news release and stated that: “Effective immediately, L&I is instituting a moratorium on approving any new retraining plans for Office Careers. This will remain in effect pending the results of our audit and/or the Workforce Board investigation. We will announce any changes to this process”.

 

In my experience, when L&I sends work injury claimants to ineffective retraining programs, it puts injured workers in a no-win situation. The person going through his or her L&I claim has to choose between:
(1) Participating in a program that’s not going to help their career;
(2) Reaching a workers’ compensation claim settlement for far less than appropriate; or
(3) Mounting an expensive legal battle to prove that L&I made a wrong decision.
Therefore, I’m thrilled that King 5 News brought this issue to light.

 

An opportunity for L&I vocational retraining

As a workers’ compensation attorney and L&I attorney representing people that were hurt at work, this chain of events gave me a lot to think about. My conclusion is that this is an opportunity for L&I to reform the culture surrounding vocational retraining in L&I claims. Currently, it appears that L&I places greater value on achieving determinations that injured workers are employable. Instead, I expect L&I to focus on having work injury claimants return to work successfully.

 

Someone saying that you’re employable is not the same as being employed. It’s also not the same as being able to maintain that employment successfully over time. If L&I wants to support a successful retraining program in L&I claims, then they must shift their culture.
They must place a greater value on retraining plans that actually make injured workers employable.

 

What’s a successful L&I claim outcome?

I’ve been thinking about this time and time again. I honestly don’t know how L&I defines a successful claim outcome. However, I suspect it includes a limited duration of disability and paying less money on an L&I claim. In my world, a successful outcome is one where an injured worker makes the best recovery possible. A successful outcome is one where a work injury client maintains a sense of financial security despite having sustained a life altering industrial injury or occupational disease.

 

L&I can do the right thing

An injured worker that’s abandoned, based upon an administrative decision that looks good on paper, is not a successful outcome. No matter how you look at it. I strongly encourage L&I to take this opportunity to do the right thing. Reform the culture. Celebrate truly successful claim outcomes. Stop incentivizing practices, behaviors, programs, policies, and a culture that does nothing but place injured workers in a no-win situation.

Office Careers Retraining Program in L&I Claims is Under Investigation

Last night, there was a news broadcast on King 5 News regarding a vocational retraining program called Office Careers. This program has been approved by the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) for a while. Since then, the local workers’ compensation community has been a buzz.

 

The Office Careers news report

According to the investigation, L&I paid millions of dollars over time to this unaccredited retraining facility without any proof of success. As a workers’ compensation attorney representing work injury claimants in Washington State, I am thrilled to see that this issue is finally exposed. In my experience, Office Careers is the “go-to” program that vocational counselors select to retrain some of the most disabled and challenging injured workers.

 

Why do vocational counselors like Office Careers?

As I see it, Office Career has become the default vocational retraining program. In my opinion, it’s because they claim to provide job retraining after a work injury that anyone can pass. However, it’s because they provide injured workers with the bare minimum marketable skills (at best). As a result, the people retrained after a work injury might be able to obtain basic minimum wage office assistant type work.

 

At first glance, the program seems ideal for injured workers living in more remote areas. That’s because Office Careers offers an entirely online retraining program. This eliminates the challenges and hassle of finding an onsite retraining program within a reasonable distance of the injured worker’s home.

 

Personal experience with the Office Careers retraining program

My client, who wishes to remain anonymous, was watching the news report the other day and gave me permission to share the following information. L&I said that this client is capable of retraining at Office Careers back in October 2018, through her L&I claim. I submitted a dispute to L&I arguing that my client lacked the aptitudes to succeed in the program. Moreover, I explained that the injured worker was being set up for defeat and failure. Here, my rational was that this work injury client has already undergone aptitude testing and received very low scores.

 

In this case, it was pretty obvious that the injured worker would need additional time and assistance to complete a GED before moving on to the program with Office Careers. Despite my arguments, L&I approved the retraining plan. My client started a GED program at a local institution but struggled to pass the testing to obtain the GED certificate. The vocational counselor wasn’t happy with the lack of progress from the local GED program. Because of this, the vocational counselor pushed for a plan modification that would involve the GED course and a general clerical course though Office Careers.

 

From in-class GED program to Office Careers

In the plan modification report, the vocational counselor stated that: “Office Careers provides the GED training and has Spanish and English-speaking instructors to assist [the work injury claimant] in passing the test”. Despite my client’s lack of success in a local in-class GED program, L&I approved the modification. Under the plan modification, Office Careers would collect over $17,000 in tuition. The injured worker started the program at Office Careers in September 2019.

 

Within the first three weeks Office Careers wrote a progress report indicating that “it might not be feasible in the timeframe of this program to prepare [the injured worker adequately] to succeed at GED” due to the worker’s low scores. It was known that the injured worker had learning disabilities. It was evident that my work injury client had only a 6th grade educational level prior to starting retraining. In a progress report from December 2019, Office Careers stated that it is “hoped that a person starting GED training (or equivalent) starts the process with at least an 8th grade understanding as a starting point”. The injured worker continued to struggle with the retraining program even though they put forth their best efforts to succeed.

 

What’s next in this L&I claim?

Ironically, today my office received a vocational closing report indicating that this work injury claimant cannot benefit from the retraining program. Consequently, they are discontinuing my client’s vocational retraining services. We knew that this determination was coming. However, it doesn’t lessen the devastating impact on this injured worker.

 

This process has been exhausting and demoralizing. It has done nothing to benefit an injured worker trying desperately to recover from a devastating industrial injury. We applaud the sharp investigative reporters at King 5 News for bringing this issue to light. And, we pray that this news will create a wave that will change the attitude towards retraining services that genuinely benefit injured workers.

« Older posts Newer posts »