Workers Compensation - Washington

Tara Reck, Managing L&I Attorney at Reck Law PLLC - Workers' Compensation Attorneys

Page 21 of 68

L&I Claims and Causal Relationship Challenges: Diagnoses That Come “Later”

If you have a work injury or work-related illness in Washington State, then you can file an L&I claim. Your L&I claim should cover all conditions that arise from the work injury or disease. We refer to these conditions as “causally related”. However, in some cases, it can be challenging to determine which conditions are causally related. Especially with L&I came late diagnosis where conditions come up later in the claim.

 

Work injury medical condition: Causation and aggravation

Under the law, a condition relates to the workplace injury if: (1) The work injury caused or aggravated the condition; or (2) The cause or aggravation was a result of medical treatment for the workplace injury. Clearly, when a diagnosis comes late, it can be difficult to establish the causal connection.

 

There are many cases where conditions arise in later stages of a workers’ compensation claim. Often, these conditions come up late due to valid and logical reasons. Common reasons include overlooking a diagnosis, or failure to obtain necessary diagnostic studies early. Another reason can be a minor injury at first, which progresses into a severe one later. Moreover, there are other reasons such as new medical conditions that develop during (or as a result of) treatment. Either way, it’s important to ensure that the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) covers these conditions. Therefore, it’s imperative to show causal relation to the workplace injury under your L&I claim.

 

Missing diagnosis in a workplace injury

It’s very common for initial work injury or workplace disease diagnoses to be simple soft tissue issues. For example, sprains or strains. These diagnoses should heal quickly within weeks or months. However, when symptoms persist, it may be necessary to take a second look. For whatever reason, more significant diagnoses may not surface up for months or even years. When doctors make the “new” diagnosis so much later, it can raise serious questions about causation. Moreover, it can be particularly challenging if treatment wasn’t consistent, or if it continued over time. This is one reason I always stress the importance of having an attentive attending provider on your L&I claim. In my experience, if your L&I claim medical provider is attentive, then you have lower likelihood for missing diagnoses.

 

Failure to obtain necessary diagnostic studies

Another common reason for “new” diagnosis that comes in late is when doctors do not request diagnostic studies early. Many work injury claimants I represent experience the frustration of authorization denials for diagnostic studies. For example, when requesting an MRI. In the most egregious cases, I’ve seen IMEs opine there is no diagnosis because there are no “objective” findings for it. However, there are no objective findings because the attending provider’s request for an MRI is denied. Sometimes, it requires litigation to finally get the MRI. Then, when we finally get the MRI, it objectively documents a more severe diagnosis. Here, these may include disc herniation, muscle, tendon or ligament tear. In some cases, it can reveal a fracture or nerve impingement.

 

Progression of the initial work injury

Occasionally, a diagnosis may not occur until later in your L&I claim because it doesn’t progress until later. For instance, a person may experience a muscle, tendon, or ligament strain as a result of a specific injury at work or work activity. Over time, the damage may progress and become worse. For example, a shoulder stain may become a partial or full thickness tear. The same goes for knee strains that can become meniscus tears. Alternatively, back injuries that turn into full disc herniation. Here, the question we ask if whether a more severe condition developed out of the original work injury? If the answer is “no”, then the more severe injury is not causally related.

 

New injury during treatment

In Washington State, under the law, injuries that occur during treatment also fall under your workers’ compensation claim. Unfortunately, these kinds of injuries are more common than you’d expect. No one ever intends for them to happen. However, additional injuries can occur during massage therapy or physical therapy. Furthermore, they can even happen as a side effect of an authorized treatment such as surgery.

 

In my experience, the most critical thing is to ensure there’s a medical report. The report should document the injury – when and how it happened. Workers’ compensation is not about fault. Therefore, it doesn’t matter how the new injury occurred. However, we still need to establish causation. Hence, it’s important to document the fact that the injury happened during treatment.

 

L&I Claim Late Diagnosis: Final remarks and conclusion

Causal relationship of medical conditions is always an important issue in a workers’ compensation claim. Often, challenges can arise, especially when diagnoses come later. That’s often the case with L&I claim late diagnosis. Yet, regardless of the reason for the late diagnosis, it’s important to establish the connection. Explicitly, the chain of connections between the “new” diagnosis and the original workplace injury or occupational disease.

 

L&I Claim Treatment Authorization for Low Back Conditions (and More)

The Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) recently collaborated with the Industrial Insurance Medical Advisory Committee and the Lumbar Surgery Subcommittee. Together, they developed a new guideline for low back surgery. Consequently, medical providers that treat work injury claimants for low back conditions need to follow new rules starting October 3, 2021. The purpose of this article is to cover L&I treatment authorization topics for L&I claims involving back conditions.

 

L&I claim back injury treatment authorization

Under the guideline, the following procedures will not be authorized under any circumstances:

 

However, if a work injury claimant meets certain criteria, the following procedures may be covered:

 

Avoiding treatment denial in your L&I claim

Many work injury victims are treated for back injury under their workers’ compensation claim in Washington State. Under your L&I claim, you can check whether your claim administrator should authorize certain treatments. In fact, you can check the guideline and associated criteria on the L&I website. You must make sure that you meet the relevant criteria. If not, Comagine will automatically recommend to deny your treatment.

 

Sometimes, there are circumstances when providers feel that treatment is appropriate. This is true even if you don’t satisfy the authorization criteria. If that’s your case, then you have several options. First, the recommending provider can have a peer-to-peer review with Comagine. After that, the review might result in treatment authorization. Alternatively, you can appeal treatment denial to the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (BIIA).

 

Appealing L&I claim treatment denial

The BIIA follows legal standards when it reviews treatment authorization appeals. Under the law, treatment should be authorized if it’s proper and necessary. The term “proper and necessary” includes services to diagnose and treat any condition caused by an injury or occupational disease. Furthermore, treatments can also be curative or rehabilitative. Here, curative refers to treatment that produces permanent changes. For example, to eliminate or lessen the clinical effects of a condition. On the other hand, rehabilitative means treatment that helps regain functional activity on a long-term basis.

 

When appealing treatment authorization, BIIA follows legal definitions to determine if treatment is necessary and proper. Therefore, L&I treatment guidelines have little relevance to the BIIA analysis. Still, it’s unlikely that the BIIA will find new or experimental treatments necessary and proper in the workers’ compensation setting.

 

L&I Claim Appeal Cost in Washington State

The Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) administers your workers’ compensation claim in Washington State. They decide what benefits work injury claimants can get. During your L&I claim (or self-insured employer claim), the department issues many decisions. Eventually, whenever you receive one, you can appeal the L&I claim decision. Furthermore, any party that disagrees with L&I’s decision can appeal to the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (BIIA).

 

Cost of BIIA appeal and the burden of proof

The BIIA is its own state agency and it’s completely separate from L&I. The BIIA reviews L&I decisions and acts like a court to decide the case. In fact, the BIIA decides the case according to the law. Here, the appealing party carries the burden of proving that L&I’s decision is wrong. In most cases, meeting the burden of proof requires testimony from expert witnesses. Usually, expert witnesses charge fees for testifying in BIIA proceedings. We refer to these fees as “costs of appeal”. Many times, these costs are significant.

 

People with a work injury claim are often upset when they learn about the cost of appeals. This is understandable. After all, most people don’t have thousands of dollars to cover costs. As a result, people might look for alternatives. In some cases, the issue at hand is primarily medical. When that’s the case, clients regularly ask me: “Can’t we just submit the medical records instead?”. The short answer is almost always: “No”.

 

L&I claim appeal and BIIA hearing procedure

In BIIA hearings, expert witnesses such as doctors must appear in person and testify. The BIIA will not allow notes, letters, reports or other documents into evidence if the other party objects to them. Practically, these kinds of documents are considered “hearsay”. Any reasonable attorney would object to them. Therefore, expert witnesses must testify when the issues under appeal involve benefits like:

 

My job as a workers’ compensation attorney

A big part of my job is helping work injury claimants decide for themselves whether the costs justify the benefits. However, in my experience, these decisions aren’t a simple cost-versus-benefit analysis. After suffering an injury at work, people have so much they have to consider. Deciding whether to proceed with an appeal is often one of the most difficult decisions they have to make.

 

« Older posts Newer posts »